
Hardly exciting to write about Gmail after it’s been around for years now and has millions of users, but despite having a Gmail address dating from when you had to get invited and wait for one, I’ve only really just embraced it. Here’s why: Spam filtering, tagging, easy filters, and very fast search – to start.
The life of someone who gets hundreds of emails every day just got easier and I just uploaded over 6,000 messages from Apple Mail into my Gmail account (if you want to know how I did it, just drop me a line at budparr AT gmail DOT com). Bye Bye Apple Mail, I’ve moved to “the cloud.”
Read more «
I have quite a few email accounts, one for personal, one for business and others for various projects. It wasn’t until I thought of using them all through the Gmail client that I started my love for Gmail. Now they all get the benefit of filtering, tagging, spam filtering and search and I get them through my iPhone via my one Gmail IMAP set up so I no longer have to check each account individually and changes there (read mail, etc) are automatically reflected on my computer.
So, access is big – Whether I’m on my iPhone, my computer, or any computer I’m looking at the same thing without any synching (I’m an anti-synchite).
The filters, which I always struggled with in Apple Mail are simple and fast, but the search function works so quickly that you only need them for all but your most common emails. The tags are so easy I’m tagging everything now (I’ve gone a little tag crazy like an administrative assistant on his first day with post-it notes).
Apple Mail’s spam filtering was okay, but never really kept up with things. Gmail’s is actually pretty amazing.
Searching, at least for the six thousand message I have (only 4% of my allotment), is very fast. I do try to delete unnecessary messages as they come in, both to keep my space clean and my search results better.
Keyboard shortcuts – learn ‘em. Navigating email is faster.
Gmail is a Web app, meaning that I get improvements as they hit without having to think about updates (why should I ever have to think about updating my software?).
Gmail is smart: Integration with the Gmail Calendar program is nearly seamless to the point it’s almost scary. It detects events in your emails (the same way it tries to present contextual ads) and asks you if you want to add to your calendar.
Integration with contacts (which in and of itself is not fully fleshed out yet) is also pretty clean. When you look up someone in your contact list or even just hover over their name in the inbox you can click to see your “recent conversations” with this person, either “to” or “from” them, something I’d have to set up in Apple Mail, which does either, but not both without setting up a smart folder. I don’t know how “recent” is defined, but for example, if I filtered to see conversations with my friend Mitch, it would list “1-20 of hundreds” etc.
It also integrates with Google Reader, another app I’ve come to rely on (more anon).
What I don’t like about Gmail
1) Ads. But as everyone knows, when you look at them every day you tune them out.
2) It’s a little scary having your life sitting on someone else’s servers (I have another post in store on that).
3) And, related to that, the potential for security leaks, the potential for government access (which, at least in principle is disturbing, although I don’t know how much of a threat that is). If I had concerns for critical data loss, I’d probably run a backup copy on my computer, but that’s not an issue for me.
4) Apple’s Mail handles attachments much more seamlessly. Nice when you’re sending photos, but I do that less because I use Flickr and other services now.
5) On the Mac, clicking a “mail-to” link doesn’t work. This is something that’s broken, so I suspect it will be fixed in time.
Enough Already
I haven’t even really gotten into the chat function, but I probably should and I’m sure there are other things to talk about. The only reason I post about Gmail at all is that I suspect a lot of other independents like me spend a lot of time grappling with an overload of email and I’m also going to be writing about Google Apps soon, so this, you might say, is an entry into that subject.
p.s.
The title of this post is an elliptic reference to Nabokov’s memoir, “Speak, Memory”. Email becomes for many of us a form of technological memory, recording events and conversations accessible in far more linear and accurate ways than the human memory.
Hide
I just upgraded to Leopard, the latest version of Apple’s operating system. I didn’t think too much of the highly touted “300 new features” but one thing put me over the edge: Fluid.
One of the best things about Leopard is that you can use an application called Fluid, which allows you to create separate and independent browsers for Web apps. I suspect that it won’t be long before something like this is integrated into Safari because if anything seems clear to me at all in this brave new internet world it is that applications are moving online. The benefits are clear: 1) the ability to easily collaborate or share; 2) the ability for developers to seamlessly improve applications and respond to market demand; 3) The ability to use your data from one application in another; 4) the ability to access your data from any device without having to sync up.
Read more «
If you’ve ever gotten your email online in Squirrel Mail or AOL or Gmail, then you’ve used a Web app, but those instances are only the beginning. Google is the exemplar here (though not alone – see Zoho) with their Google Docs, including spreadsheets, documents and presentations, all easily shareable among groups just like their calendar and the wiki pages built into Google Groups. What Fluid does is allow you to segregate those online applications into their own browser window completely independent of the one you use for actual browsing. To someone like me who is highly dependent upon Basecamp and Backpack for their workflow this seemingly small thing is a boon to the way I operate.
Synching between computers is (soon to be) dead
I’ve also given up on using Apple’s Mail and iCal programs – as compellingly elegant as they are – for the far better designed (functionally speaking) and more quickly evolving Gmail and Google Calendar. Synching is dead and Apple’s products are built upon a cumbersome model of uploading and downloading across users and computers. I get email from all of my addresses (4 or so for my various projects) and I can much more easily share calendars, at least with anyone willing to have a Google account.
This stuff is merely the beginning because with Web based apps you also get something developers call the API, which essentially opens up your data from one application to be used in another. Easy example is how I have my Google calendar embedded in another application (Backpack) that I keep all my to-do lists and notes in.
Now, truth is, Apple isn’t really all that behind the times. They have a Web-based version of their mail program, although you have to pay a membership fee to use it and functionally it’s still old school, but most importantly, I think the introduction of the iPhone, which primarily relies on Web-based apps for non-core functionality, and their super-thin and highly coveted by this tech junkie MacBook Air signifies that all you really need is a to get on the Web. Personally, I’m moving to “The Cloud” as techies call it and I’ll be writing more about that here soon.
Hide
I’m not in the habit of merely ‘re-blogging’ (he says with his second post of other people’s material) but I found this video by marketing guru Seth Godin affirmative and worth watching to keep in mind on those late nights when you’re trying to get in a little writing or a little more done to accomplish what you want without the protective net of a large corporation:
I ran across a presentation by Guy Kawasaki on the Expression Engine blog yesterday. Not sure why I clicked through because I’m generally a skeptic about gurus, presenters team rah rah, but I did and played it in the background while I worked (it’s 40 minutes long). But a funny thing happened: I found myself taking notes.
The common theme among great presenters and equally, the theme I drew from Kawasaki’s talk is distillation. I use “distillation” instead of the word “simplification” because instead of making complex things easy for anyone to understand, Kawasaki, I felt, was, in his message and delivery, concentrating complex topics into their essence. If you can’t get it down to three words, you don’t understand it. Plausible, yes.
One thing that resonated with me was – and mind you, he’s talking to entrepreneurs – was his idea that a successful business model must “make meaning.” It should “increase the quality of life,” “right a wrong” or “prevent the end of something good.” A central idea around much of what I do is to help those in the world of arts and culture get their work out into the world – that turns me on and my efforts personally are geared toward finding a way to do that while making a living. As I go about making wrenching changes to my business and various projects it’s validating to hear that sort of language come from a venture capitalist. I won’t summarize any more of what he says here because the concepts would sound merely simple. I think it’s much more meaningful if you hear it yourself:
Lifehacker has tips on getting free Web space through blog services and others and discusses some of the features of Google Apps, which I’ve been testing out a bit myself. Lifehacker recommend getting your own domain name (I do to), which you can cheaply do through GoDaddy.
I usually focus on blog hosts, but two options mentioned in the article for getting up static pages are Google Pages (M. Allen Cunningham’s author site is a good example I know of) and FreeWebs. Apple’s .mac is not free, but seems easy to get at least a basic page up, although I’ve had at least one report that the real-life results are not so great.
NPR has posted Timeline: The Life of the Blog placing the first blog in 1994 by Claudio Pinhanez, which is also about the time my friend Levi started his blog-like Website Litkicks, but it wasn’t until 1999 that the first publishing tools started to come about (Blogger in ’99, MovableType ’01, Wordpress ’03).
I started my first blog in 2003 about the time, according to the article, Christopher Lydon started one of the first ever podcasts (in 2005 I appeared on Lydon’s radio show, which was also broadcast in Boston). Now there are 112 million blogs, a dubious figure to be sure, but even if that number is half-right that’s a lot of blogs. It was the end of 2005 that I started MetaxuCafé, a network of litblogs. Networks of one sort or another proliferate because it’s difficult to keep track of all these sites.
Despite many warnings that blogs are over there seems to be new entries every day and I think the overall quality is improving all the time, thanks in part to their professional use in all walks of life. Search for blog on Google and there are other histories, other stories. It’s interesting to muse about the future of the blog, but I’ll save that for another time.
Note to self: get a faster processor. If you think Aperture is great but more sluggish than it should be, check out these 32 tips from Bagelturf, among which some are draconian (like turn off previews), some wishful thinking (processor), and some quite helpful (reindex and rebuild the Aperture database).
Everyone Should Use Backpack: Well, everyone who juggles a lot of projects (or one multipart project) and spends most of their workday at their computer. Backpack by 37 Signals is the little sister to Basecamp, a product I’ve been using for a year or two for collaboration. However, in some ways Basecamp is too much and in others it’s not enough, but most importantly everything in Basecamp is centered around projects and collaboration, whereas my reality is that I split my time between client projects and internal projects and generating ideas or collecting information; activities that don’t necessarily lend themselves to project-structured software or to-do software.
In short, I think of Backpack as a big online spiral notebook
Match the application to the job
I didn’t embrace Backpack until I realized that most of my clients didn’t really care if they had a project-space of their own to log-in to (they just wanted me to do my job) and many of the features of Basecamp weren’t adopted by my collaborators. After evaluating a lot of project management software, most of which seems inconducive to actively switching from project to project and more designed for large-scale (as in more than 10 people and with reporting requirements) projects anyway, I turned to Backpack. Backpack’s strength is not in time-line management or collaboration – although it does have a calendar and can be shared – but in keeping together all the information you need to get things done. It is also very simple, flexible and easy to change.
Getting started
Read more «
Much of what I have to say here won’t mean anything without you seeing what it looks like, so I suggest if you think this will meet your needs at all, you hop over to the Backpack site and sign up for a free account to try out.
How it works
Backpack works with individual pages – each page has a place for notes, files or images, to-do lists, links to other pages, and finally tags. The tags become important as you start to build up a lot of pages (I currently have 36 pages set up). There is also a reminders page for those to-dos that must be done at a certain time, an easy to use calendar (although I use Google Calendar) and writeboards for collaborating on documents.
Pages are the core of the system. Each page is listed in the sidebar (this list is the only thing in the sidebar except for upcoming reminders, keeping things as simple as possible), but you can also remove them to keep more active pages up front. The sidebar list is kept in alphabetical order, so I add symbols in front of project names based on each one’s time sensitivity (it’s quick and easy to change a project name):
- “+” for a project that has work to be done now;
- “-” for next up;
- “=” for soon;
- “@” for ongoing;
- “[” for projects that have not started, but will soon.
- “\” for non-client projects
- “__________________” break – everything below is a notebook page
Those symbols fall in their respective (lexical) order in the sidebar and allow me to glance at or change my project priorities. If this seems like too much for you, it’s not a mandatory way of doing things, just what works for me.
Templates
If you work on a lot of similar projects, you can set up a page to be used only for a template (just name it and/or tag it template and take it off the sidebar) and when a new project comes along, just go to that page and duplicate it, then rename with your project’s name.
Email
The email feature is important. Backpack’s core functionality is based on email – notifications for reminders are sent via email and each page has a unique email address where notes, to-dos, files and images can be emailed. I put a project’s email address into my client’s address book entry and whenever something relevant comes in, I just forward the email to their page. This makes it easy for each page to be a central repository for information.
So what types of information do I keep on these pages? I use a to-do list for workflow, laying out the major steps of a project, usually supplemented with ad hoc items as they come along. As I set up a client’s hosting or content mangement system, or anything where there’s a set of detailed information, I save it as a note or email. I use the Backpack plan with secure SSL encryption, by the way. I also keep quick notes, projected launch dates or other critical data in the “body” of the page, which is nothing more than an easily editable note section at the top of the page.
Control point
Most importantly, I use my main page as a central point for all my projects, keeping my “today’s priorities” to-do list, a list of things I’m waiting on and lists of things to do that are not tied to any single project. I cycle through my active project pages (which is a good practice in and of itself) to generate my priority list and make sure nothing falls through the cracks.
Drawbacks
For someone to collaborate on a project via Backpack, they need their own Backpack account – there’s no central place for everyone to log-in. For those projects, I still use Basecamp. I keep a link to my Basecamp account on the top of my main Backpack page.
Links
That’s the core of how I use Backpack. Since I’ve started using it, I feel more in control over my projects. Here are a couple relevant links from the Backpack blog with tips that I’ve adopted:
making_it_easier_to_remember_a_pages_email_address.php
pages_adding_content_to_a_page_via_email
Do sift through the entire blog though. Backpack lends itself to little tricks to make it work best for you, so you’ll find a lot of tips there.
I often look at other project or to-do list management software and every time they fail in one important aspect – too many features that limit flexibility.
Hide
Page 1 of 1 pages